• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

OnlineGamblingWebsites.com 2f2q5j

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • Gambling Sites
  • Betting Sites
    • Betting Offers
    • Online Bookies
    • Sports Betting Articles
  • Casino Sites
    • Casino Bonuses
    • Slot Sites
    • Casino Games
    • Casino Software
    • Casino Articles
  • Bingo Sites
    • Bingo Offers
    • Bingo Networks
    • Bingo Articles
  • Poker Sites
    • Poker Bonuses
    • Poker Games
    • Poker Networks
    • Poker Articles
  • Lottery Sites
  • Gambling Blog

The People Who Bought Every Lottery Ticket 4a1r5s

April 28, 2020

PohSmith / Bigstockphoto.com

Everyone who has ever bought a lottery ticket will have dreamt of winning millions; after all, why else would you play if not for hopes of taking home the biggest prize? Of those that have been involved with playing the lottery over the years, some have come up with nefarious means to attempt to help them take home huge amounts of money at the lottery organiser’s expense.

That’s not to say that those nefarious means have always been illegal, of course. The best example of this occurred in 1992 when a secret syndicate attempted to buy enough tickets to cover every possible combination of results, thereby winning the jackpot of around £1.7 million. It wasn’t illegal, but it also wasn’t in the ‘spirit of the game’. So, how did they do it?

The Omens That Led Them To Try It 3x2725

The mastermind behind the attempt to buy every possible combination of lottery tickets was an named Stefan Klincewicz. Cork-born and of Polish descent, he ed forces with twenty-seven other people to create a syndicate that was hoping to win big. The reason that they had decided to go for it that weekend was that it wasn’t just the main jackpot that was on offer.

The National Lottery had decided to award a £100 prize to all of the people that matched 4 numbers. This meant that those with Match 3, Match 4 and Match 5 tickets would win money, but the Match 4 folks would win even more. The play to buy every possible combination of numbers would likely result in a number of Match 4 winning tickets in the process.

It was seen by the syndicate as being a ‘blunder’ by the National Lottery, so it was only right that they strike whilst they stood to make more money than ever. It also helped that the Lotto hadn’t been won for two weeks, meaning that the jackpot stood at £1.7 million, meaning that there was a good chance that the syndicate could make a decent net win.

The Syndicate c2f5a

Whilst not all of the names of the syndicate will ever be known, what we can tell you is that it was well-financed. He turned to gamblers that were used to spending large sums of money on favourites with short odds. They began to give him blocks of money ranging from £5,000 to £100,000, believing that they would be likely to receive a thirty percent return.

One member of the syndicate spoke to John Martin at the Irish Independent in the aftermath of the sting. He said that he only knew around eight other people who were involved. He also said that he wasn’t shouldering the burden of his stake on his own, having split it with several friends. He wondered whether others had similarly ‘hedged their bets’, making the syndicate even bigger in reality.

Whilst we can’t tell you much about the other of the syndicate, we do know a bit about Klincewicz. He had been in a syndicate before, ing Paddy Mulligan and eight others in a syndicate for Scruffy Murphy’s Bar in Dublin, which had won £2,439,760 in April of 1990. It was Europe’s biggest lottery win at the time and those behind it were treated like celebrities.

The Plan 405y4r

The plan that Stefan Klincewicz came up with for his own syndicate was a relatively simple one. He and his syndicate would buy as many lottery tickets as they could, spending £973,896 in the process. They would try to ensure that they bought a ticket with every possible combination of winning lines, but Klincewicz also had a plan in place for if they didn’t manage to do that.

He worked out that there were 1,945,792 possible combinations of numbers at the time, which would have been too time consuming to cover. As a result, Klincewicz decided that the syndicate would buy what he decided were the most likely combination of numbers first, leaving the least likely until last. At 50 pence per ticket, that would cost £973,896.

This was based on a mathematical formula that he had worked out, viewing the balls that came out most often compared to those that were selected randomly the least amount of times. It was a combination of ‘brute force attack’ on the Irish Lotto’s system and mathematical genius, putting the syndicate in a position where it was best placed to win as much as possible.

The National Lottery Attempt to Thwart the Plan 5hh5n

TK Kurikawa / Bigstockphoto.com

Whilst Klincewicz’s plan might have been a solid one in theory, the practice of it was quite different. For starters, he and his syndicate had to arrange for the buying of a large number of lottery tickets; more, in fact, than the National Lottery tended to see be being bought from the shops and newsagents that used to be licensed to sell them.

The result was that red flags started to pop up on the company’s system as it became clear that tickets were being bought at huge rates. Terminals that had previously been taking in about £1,000 a week for the Saturday jackpot game were suddenly taking in £10,000 and more for the weekend’s draw. The National Lottery’s Abbey Street headquarters in Dublin took note.

Of course, there was nothing that they could really do about people buying lots of lottery tickets and, in many ways, it was good for them if people were spending money on tickets. Yet it was also felt that something wasn’t quite ‘right’ about what was going on, so vendors were told on the Friday afternoon to only sell ‘200% of a ten-week average of Lotto sales’.

The aim was to stop newsagents and shops from taking large amounts of lottery coupons if their normal Lotto business was only a fraction of that. A member went into one shop on the Friday afternoon looking to buy £5,000 worth of tickets. The National Lottery gave the go-ahead when the shop owner called them, but by later in the day similar amounts were being refused.

How the Syndicate Responded 4q5i5i

The syndicate responded by organising ‘runners’, who were given large sums of money to go and buy tickets in different shops around Ireland. Rumours soon began to emerge of newsagents pulling down the shutters of their shops in order to allow syndicate to work around the clock in getting their coupons into the machines.

The National Lottery responded by shutting down certain machines, which was something that the syndicate had not foreseen. It ‘took them by surprise’. Ultimately, they didn’t hit the £973,896 target that would have meant every single combination having been bought, but they did manage to purchase £820,000 worth of tickets, or eighty percent of the target.

What Happened 5v6y35

The night of the draw, syndicate around Ireland will have glued to their televisions to watch The Pat Kenny Show on RTE. A representative from the National Lottery appeared on the screen and read out the winning numbers, which the syndicate had covered on one of its tickets. The began to celebrate, believing that they’d pulled it off.

Things soon made a turn for the worst, however, when Ray Bates, the head of the National Lottery at the time, gave them news that they desperately didn’t want to hear. Two other winning tickets had also been bought, one in a Dunnes Store in Finglas and the other belonging to a syndicate in Newbridge, Co Kildare. Each ticket was worth £568,682.

Bates said that the actions of the syndicate was ‘legal, but not in the spirit of the game’, receiving corresponding cheers from the watching audience. TD Gay Mitchell later said that the syndicate should be the subject of a Revenue Commissioners’ investigation, though this never actually ended up transpiring.

A public relations executive with the Lottery at the time, Dave Curtlin, said that the £100 Match 4 prize was intended to be a way of ‘giving back to the public’ from winnings that had gone unclaimed in the past. He said that they were ‘aware of the risk’ that someone might abuse the gesture, explaining the animosity between the Lottery and the syndicate.

The Winnings 1o193z

It was an animosity that carried on when Stefan Klincewicz and another syndicate member named Paddy Kehoe turned up at Lottery headquarters to pick up the cheque for their winnings. They were soon informed that all of the of the syndicate would need to sign a letter that would indemnify the National Lottery if others were to claim to be part of the syndicate.

A solicitor named Brendan Liddy was acting for the group and wasn’t impressed. He said that it would take a long time to all and that g such a letter would mean that the syndicate would take on any responsibility for legal complications instead of the National Lottery. In the end, the group did receive its payout.

There remains some debate about exactly how much that payout ended up being. Klincewicz claimed that the addition of the various Match 3, Match 4 and Match 5 prizes took their total winnings to £1,166,000, which was a net win of £310,000 before expenses and costs were taken out of the total amount. It’s likely that the group broke even rather than made a fortune.

Certainly the group weren’t treated with the same sense of adulation that the group from the Scruffy Murphy Bar had received two years before. There was no meal thrown for them at Polo 1, nor were they invited to London or asked to appear on the Derek Jameson show. Instead, their own real lasting legacy was what the Lottery did next.

The Repercussions 464c71

As far as the syndicate was concerned, there were no repercussions to speak of. As mentioned, what they did might not have been within the ‘spirit’ of the National Lottery, but it was certainly not illegal. Even so, the organisers of the Lotto in Ireland used the syndicate’s attempts to ‘buy all the tickets’ to change the way in which the game was run.

The nature of a lottery that requires you to select six numbers from a possible thirty-six means that it is always open to the potential of a brute force attack, such as that instigated by Klincewicz and his team. That was especially the case when the cost of a ticket was 50 pence per line, meaning that it would cost half of the 1,947,792 possible combinations to try it.

As a result, the National Lottery in Ireland moved to a thirty-nine ball game later in 1992, immediately changing the odds of winning it to one in 3,262,623. They also doubled the starting jackpot and introduced a Bonus Ball element to the game. In 1994, the odds moved to being over one in five million when it was a made into a six from forty-two game.

As for Klincewicz, he continued to make the Lottery his area of expertise. He moved to the Rathfarnham are of Dublin and set up other companies that aimed at winning the National Lottery and, later, the EuroMillions. He is the syndicate manager of one such company, MegaLotto. They tend to attempt it via far more conventional means than the 1992 syndicate, though.

Previous Post: « Biggest Online Poker Pots
Next Post: Which UK Lottery Has The Best Odds? »

Primary Sidebar 5m5572

Latest Blog Posts 332za

Telephone Betting: Is It Still Possible to Bet Over the Phone?
Where Does the Bookie Name Ladbrokes Come From?
What Happens When a Jockey Finishes a Race Too Early?
The Disgrace of Gijón: How & Austria Colluded to Progress in the World Cup
Five Loopholes in Sport That Led to Rule Changes

More Recent Posts 1532w

  • Contaminated Feed in Horse Racing: What, Why & How?
  • Does the Grand National Always Have 40 Runners?
  • Do You Get Professional Gamblers & What Do They Actually Do?
  • Are Handshake Bets Legally Enforceable?
  • Illegal Gamblers: Which Countries Have the Strictest Anti Gambling Laws?

Related Posts 5i3v55

  • Can You Claim a Win From a Damaged Lottery Ticket or Scratch Card?
  • Most Charitable Lotto Winners: Has Anyone Ever Donated Their Entire Lottery Winnings to Charity?
  • The Weirdest Things That Lottery Winners Spent Their Money On
  • Million Pound Bond Winners with the Smallest Holdings
  • How Does the Pick My Postcode Lottery Work & Is It Really Free?
  • Does Anyone Really Win Jackpots at an Online Casino?
  • Beginners Luck: The Lottery Winners Who Won on Their First Try
  • What Are the Biggest Scratch Card Wins in the UK?
  • Can You Buy a Full Pack of Scratch Cards in the UK?
  • What Happens If You Lose a Winning Lottery Ticket?
  • Can You Check If a Scratch Card Has Won or Claim It Online?
  • How Much Money Does Omaze Raise for Charity in the UK?
  • When Did the Lottery Start in the UK?
  • What Are the Odds of Winning an Omaze House?
  • How 433 People Won the Philipines Lottery Jackpot
  • Workplace Syndicates: The Lottery Winners Who All Quit at the Same Time
  • Lottery Near Misses: The Unlucky Players Who Missed Out on Millions
  • Lottery Syndicate Squabbles: Eight Times a Lotto Jackpot Ended in Arguments
  • How Do Lottery Syndicates Work & Are They Legally Binding?
  • Bill Morgan: The Man Who Cheated Death & Then Won the Lottery on Camera
  • 'Jerry & Marge Go Large' Is Based on the True Story of How the Selbees Beat the Michigan Lottery
  • What Are the Odds of Winning the Postcode Lottery?
  • Lotto Louts: Worst Behaved Lottery Winners
  • Do Scratch Cards Expire?
  • What Are the Biggest Rollover Jackpots in the National Lottery?
  • Do Fewer People Play the Lottery Now Compared to When It First Launched?
  • How Have the National Lottery Rules Changed Over the Years?
  • El Gordo: The World's Biggest Lottery Jackpot at €720m
  • Who Runs the Lottery in the UK & Why Might It Be Changing?
  • Lottery Taxes Around the World: Which Countries Take a Slice of the Jackpot?
  • The Woman Who Shared the Lottery Jackpot With Herself
  • Should You Play the Same Numbers in the Lottery Every Week?
  • Can You Still Buy Scratch Cards After the Jackpot Has Been Won?
  • Lottery Fraudsters: The Scammers Who Tried to Con Their Way to a Lotto Win
  • Can Anyone Run a Raffle Legally or Are They Considered Gambling?
  • South African Lottery Draws 6 Sequential Numbers: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  • Lucky Dip v Playing Your Own Numbers in the Lottery
  • The Million Dollar Handshake: $22m Lottery Jackpot Shared to Honour 30 Year Pact
  • The Lottery’s Most Common Numbers: Which Numbers Have Been Drawn the Most?
  • Which UK Lottery Has The Best Odds?
  • The People Who Bought Every Lottery Ticket
  • Camelot Refuses to Pay Out on Winning Lottery Ticket Bought With Stolen Card
  • Win a Car Competitions: How It Works & Does Anyone Ever Win?
  • Has Anyone Won the Lottery More Than Once?
  • Biggest Unclaimed Lottery Wins
  • House Raffles: Are They Legal & Has Anyone Actually Won One?
  • Stolen Lottery Tickets & The Winners Who Nearly Missed Out
  • The World’s Biggest Lottery Wins
  • Lottery Winners Who Spent It All & Ended up Broke

Popular Articles 5j5i4k

  • What Was The First Online Casino?
  • Roulette Strategies: Destroying The Martingale System Myth
  • National Lottery Odds – What Are The Chances Of Winning The Lotto Jackpot?
  • What Happens if you Buy Every Combination of Lottery Tickets?
  • What Are The Chances Of Winning The Lottery In Your Lifetime
  • Internet Sweepstake Cafes: What Are They & How Do They Work?

Copyright OnlineGamblingWebsites.com © 2006–2025 | Blog Archive

Established in 2006 under the name Good Bonus Guide (GoodBonusGuide.com) and briefly known as OnlineBetting.eu

18+ Please Bet Responsibly | GambleAware.org - Gamstop